Page Loading... please wait!


This message not going away?
Ensure Javascript is on and click the box
Unregistered? Register for a user account. Home :: Downloads :: Submit News :: Reviews :: FAQ   


Social Bookmark


Sandy Berger Headlines

Feeds -  Popular -  Latest
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters via Yahoo!Xtra News)
January 5, 2009, 11:10 pm EST
NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters)
January 5, 2009, 10:06 pm EST
NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters via Yahoo! News)
January 5, 2009, 9:52 pm EST
NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
BAD 'DAY' FOR ANN COULTER (New York Post)
January 5, 2009, 7:53 pm EST
CONTROVERSIAL conservative Ann Coulter blew a gasket yesterday when the "Today" show abruptly canceled an appearance on the day her new book about the Obamas comes out. The cancellation sparked reports that she had been "banned for life" from NBC...
Ann Coulter Kicked Off NBC's 'Today Show' (Editor & Publisher)
January 5, 2009, 7:34 pm EST
NEW YORK Was columnist and author Ann Coulter merely cancelled for one day -- or, as Matt Drudge headlines it at his blog, "banned for life" due to alleged untruths in her new book?
Liberal Media Won't Help Poor Ann Coulter Plug Her Book [Bias] (Gawker)
January 5, 2009, 6:30 pm EST
Ann Coulter has a new book out called GLORBAHLF: LIBERAL TERROR DEATH and she was going to go sell this book on Today but then NBC woke up and remembered that its not 2002. These terrible people...
Standing up to Bush (Las Vegas Sun)
January 5, 2009, 11:42 am EST
Recurring themes of the Bush administration — secrecy and low regard for science — are prevalent in two White House actions that are now stimulating considerable opposition.
Patrick Tyler's 'A World of Trouble': an opinionated look at the Middle East (Austin American-Statesman)
January 3, 2009, 12:09 pm EST
Patrick Tyler is a veteran foreign correspondent who has worked the Middle East and China beats since the mid '80s, first for The Washington Post and then for The New York Times.


Money Clip


Past Articles

Older articles

National Defense

Ever since March 1995, American officials had had in the backs of their minds Aum Shinrikyo's release of sarin nerve gas in the Tokyo subway. President Clinton himself had expressed great concern about chemical and biological terrorism in the United States. Bin Ladin had reportedly been heard to speak of wanting a "Hiroshima" and at least 10,000 casualties. The CIA reported that a soil sample from the vicinity of the al Shifa plant had tested positive for EMPTA, a precursor chemical for VX, a nerve gas whose lone use was for mass killing. Two days before the embassy bombings, Clarke's staff wrote that Bin Ladin "has invested in and almost certainly has access to VX produced at a plant in Sudan."43 Senior State Department officials believed that they had received a similar verdict independently, though they and Clarke's staff were probably relying on the same report. Mary McCarthy, the NSC senior director responsible for intelligence programs, initially cautioned Berger that the "bottom line" was that "we will need much better intelligence on this facility before we seriously consider any options." She added that the link between Bin Ladin and al Shifa was "rather uncertain at this point." Berger has told us that he thought about what might happen if the decision went against hitting al Shifa, and nerve gas was used in a New York subway two weeks later.44

By the early hours of the morning of August 20, President Clinton and all his principal advisers had agreed to strike Bin Ladin camps in Afghanistan near Khowst, as well as hitting al Shifa. The President took the Sudanese tannery off the target list because he saw little point in killing uninvolved people without doing significant harm to Bin Ladin. The principal with the most qualms regarding al Shifa was Attorney General Reno. She expressed concern about attacking two Muslim countries at the same time. Looking back, she said that she felt the "premise kept shifting."45

Later on August 20, Navy vessels in the Arabian Sea fired their cruise missiles. Though most of them hit their intended targets, neither Bin Ladin nor any other terrorist leader was killed. Berger told us that an after-action review by Director Tenet concluded that the strikes had killed 20-30 people in the camps but probably missed Bin Ladin by a few hours. Since the missiles headed for Afghanistan had had to cross Pakistan, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs was sent to meet with Pakistan's army chief of staff to assure him the missiles were not coming from India. Officials in Washington speculated that one or another Pakistani official might have sent a warning to the Taliban or Bin Ladin.46

Page << | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >>

Pocket Lint

This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as we do when the baby gets hold of a hammer.

-- Will Rogers

In the Cuff

Poll

Most inept figure during Katrina?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 110
Comments: 0

Pocket Books


Basic Economics
Thomas Sowell

Categories Menu

Freshly Pressed