Page Loading... please wait!


This message not going away?
Ensure Javascript is on and click the box
Unregistered? Register for a user account. Home :: Downloads :: Submit News :: Reviews :: FAQ   


Social Bookmark


Sandy Berger Headlines

Feeds -  Popular -  Latest
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters via Yahoo!Xtra News)
January 5, 2009, 11:10 pm EST
NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters)
January 5, 2009, 10:06 pm EST
NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters via Yahoo! News)
January 5, 2009, 9:52 pm EST
NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
BAD 'DAY' FOR ANN COULTER (New York Post)
January 5, 2009, 7:53 pm EST
CONTROVERSIAL conservative Ann Coulter blew a gasket yesterday when the "Today" show abruptly canceled an appearance on the day her new book about the Obamas comes out. The cancellation sparked reports that she had been "banned for life" from NBC...
Ann Coulter Kicked Off NBC's 'Today Show' (Editor & Publisher)
January 5, 2009, 7:34 pm EST
NEW YORK Was columnist and author Ann Coulter merely cancelled for one day -- or, as Matt Drudge headlines it at his blog, "banned for life" due to alleged untruths in her new book?
Liberal Media Won't Help Poor Ann Coulter Plug Her Book [Bias] (Gawker)
January 5, 2009, 6:30 pm EST
Ann Coulter has a new book out called GLORBAHLF: LIBERAL TERROR DEATH and she was going to go sell this book on Today but then NBC woke up and remembered that its not 2002. These terrible people...
Standing up to Bush (Las Vegas Sun)
January 5, 2009, 11:42 am EST
Recurring themes of the Bush administration — secrecy and low regard for science — are prevalent in two White House actions that are now stimulating considerable opposition.
Patrick Tyler's 'A World of Trouble': an opinionated look at the Middle East (Austin American-Statesman)
January 3, 2009, 12:09 pm EST
Patrick Tyler is a veteran foreign correspondent who has worked the Middle East and China beats since the mid '80s, first for The Washington Post and then for The New York Times.


Money Clip


Past Articles

Older articles

National Defense

With a new operational strategy, the CIA evaluated its capture options. None scored high marks. The CIA had no confidence in the Pakistani effort. In the event that Bin Ladin traveled to the Kandahar region in southern Afghanistan, the tribal network there was unlikely to attack a heavily guarded Bin Ladin; the Counterterrorist Center rated the chance of success at less than 10 percent. To the northwest, the Uzbeks might be ready for a cross-border sortie in six months; their chance of success was also rated at less than 10 percent.192

In the northeast were Massoud's Northern Alliance forces-perhaps the CIA's best option. In late October, a group of officers from the Counterterrorist Center flew into the Panjshir Valley to meet up with Massoud, a hazardous journey in rickety helicopters that would be repeated several times in the future. Massoud appeared committed to helping the United States collect intelligence on Bin Ladin's activities and whereabouts and agreed to try to capture him if the opportunity arose. The Bin Ladin unit was satisfied that its reporting on Bin Ladin would now have a second source. But it also knew that Massoud would act against Bin Ladin only if his own interests and those of the United States intersected. By early December, the CIA rated this possibility at less than 15 percent.193

Finally, the CIA considered the possibility of putting U.S. personnel on the ground in Afghanistan. The CIA had been discussing this option with Special Operations Command and found enthusiasm on the working level but reluctance at higher levels. CIA saw a 95 percent chance of Special Operations Command forces capturing Bin Ladin if deployed-but less than a 5 percent chance of such a deployment. Sending CIA officers into Afghanistan was to be considered "if the gain clearly outweighs the risk"-but at this time no such gains presented themselves to warrant the risk.194

As mentioned earlier, such a protracted deployment of U.S. Special Operations Forces into Afghanistan, perhaps as part of a team joined to a deployment of the CIA's own officers, would have required a major policy initiative (probably combined with efforts to secure the support of at least one or two neighboring countries) to make a long-term commitment, establish a durable presence on the ground, and be prepared to accept the associated risks and costs. Such a military plan was never developed for interagency consideration before 9/11.As 1999 came to a close, the CIA had a new strategic plan in place for capturing Bin Ladin, but no option was rated as having more than a 15 percent chance of achieving that objective.

Back to 911 Report CONTENTS

Page << | 1 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | >>

Pocket Lint

What's *just* has been debated for centuries but let me offer you my definition of social justice: I keep what I earn and you keep what you earn. Do you disagree? Well then tell me how much of what I earn *belongs* to you – and why?

-- Walter Williams

In the Cuff

Poll

Most inept figure during Katrina?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 110
Comments: 0

Pocket Books

Categories Menu

Freshly Pressed