Page Loading... please wait!


This message not going away?
Ensure Javascript is on and click the box
Unregistered? Register for a user account. Home :: Downloads :: Submit News :: Reviews :: FAQ   


Social Bookmark


Sandy Berger Headlines

Feeds -  Popular -  Latest
Government Shouldn't Fund Media Bias with Taxpayer Dollars (Christian News Wire)
January 6, 2009, 3:30 pm EST
WASHINGTON , Jan. 6 / Christian Newswire / -- Boycott The New York Times editor Don Feder said today that the idea of a government bailout for struggling newspapers, which has been floated recently by some legislators and journalists, is ...
Ann Coulter Cries Foul Over Today Cancellation (Seattle Post-Intelligencer)
January 6, 2009, 3:00 pm EST
The "liberal media elite" is taking another bashing, and this time it's not from Sarah Palin.
RATE THIS ARTICLE (Crosswalk.com)
January 6, 2009, 11:29 am EST
In the lull before inauguration I’m taking today and Monday to say some things about the media. First – and I know as a columnist this may sound self-serving – newspapers must be saved.
RATE THIS ARTICLE (Crosswalk.com)
January 6, 2009, 11:28 am EST
On Friday, I made the case for helping your local newspaper survive, no matter how frustrated you might be with it. Today I want to tell you another survival story.
Today Kisses Coulter Goodbye (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
January 6, 2009, 10:42 am EST
http://images.eonline.com/resize/66/66/eol_images/Entire_Site/20090106/300.ad.AnnCoulter.010609.jpgThe liberal media elite has run afoul of Ann Coulter yet again. Well, that didn’t take long. The lightning-rod conservative pundit is crying ...
Today Kisses Coulter Goodbye (E! Online)
January 6, 2009, 10:21 am EST
The liberal media elite has run afoul of Ann Coulter yet again. Well, that didn't take long. The lightning-rod conservative pundit is crying conspiracy—liberal media elite...
Standing up to Bush (Las Vegas Sun)
January 5, 2009, 11:42 am EST
Recurring themes of the Bush administration — secrecy and low regard for science — are prevalent in two White House actions that are now stimulating considerable opposition.
Patrick Tyler's 'A World of Trouble': an opinionated look at the Middle East (Austin American-Statesman)
January 3, 2009, 12:09 pm EST
Patrick Tyler is a veteran foreign correspondent who has worked the Middle East and China beats since the mid '80s, first for The Washington Post and then for The New York Times.


Money Clip


Past Articles

Older articles

911: 911 Report section 5.4 A Money Trail?

Posted by: archiveguard on Aug 08, 2005 - 04:24 PM
National Defense

Charities

In addition, entire charities, such as the al Wafa organization, may have wittingly participated in funneling money to al Qaeda. In those cases, al Qaeda operatives controlled the entire organization, including access to bank accounts.120 Charities were a source of money and also provided significant cover, which enabled operatives to travel undetected under the guise of working for a humanitarian organization.

It does not appear that any government other than the Taliban financially supported al Qaeda before 9/11, although some governments may have contained al Qaeda sympathizers who turned a blind eye to al Qaeda's fundraising activities.121 Saudi Arabia has long been considered the primary source of al Qaeda funding, but we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization. (This conclusion does not exclude the likelihood that charities with significant Saudi government sponsorship diverted funds to al Qaeda.)122

Still, al Qaeda found fertile fund-raising ground in Saudi Arabia, where extreme religious views are common and charitable giving was both essential to the culture and subject to very limited oversight.123 Al Qaeda also sought money from wealthy donors in other Gulf states.

Al Qaeda frequently moved the money it raised by hawala, an informal and ancient trust-based system for transferring funds.124 In some ways, al Qaeda had no choice after its move to Afghanistan in 1996: first, the banking system there was antiquated and undependable; and second, formal banking was risky due to the scrutiny that al Qaeda received after the August 1998 East Africa embassy bombings, including UN resolutions against it and the Taliban.125 Bin Ladin relied on the established hawala networks operating in Pakistan, in Dubai, and throughout the Middle East to transfer funds efficiently. Hawaladars associated with al Qaeda may have used banks to move and store money, as did various al Qaeda fund-raisers and operatives outside of Afghanistan, but there is little evidence that Bin Ladin or core al Qaeda members used banks while in Afghanistan.126

Before 9/11, al Qaeda spent funds as quickly as it received them. Actual terrorist operations represented a relatively small part of al Qaeda's estimated $30 million annual operating budget. Al Qaeda funded salaries for jihadists, training camps, airfields, vehicles, arms, and the development of training manuals. Bin Ladin provided approximately $10-$20 million per year to the Taliban in return for safe haven. Bin Ladin also may have used money to create alliances with other terrorist organizations, although it is unlikely that al Qaeda was funding an overall jihad program. Rather, Bin Ladin selectively provided startup funds to new groups or money for specific terrorist operations.127

Al Qaeda has been alleged to have used a variety of illegitimate means, particularly drug trafficking and conflict diamonds, to finance itself. While the drug trade was a source of income for the Taliban, it did not serve the same purpose for al Qaeda, and there is no reliable evidence that Bin Ladin was involved in or made his money through drug trafficking.128 Similarly, we have seen no persuasive evidence that al Qaeda funded itself by trading in African conflict diamonds.129 There also have been claims that al Qaeda financed itself through manipulation of the stock market based on its advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. Exhaustive investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, FBI, and other agencies have uncovered no evidence that anyone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited through securities transactions.130

To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance. Al Qaeda had many avenues of funding. If a particular funding source had dried up, al Qaeda could have easily tapped a different source or diverted funds from another project to fund an operation that cost $400,000-$500,000 over nearly two years.

Page << | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | >>

Pocket Lint

This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as we do when the baby gets hold of a hammer.

-- Will Rogers

In the Cuff

Poll

Most inept figure during Katrina?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 110
Comments: 0

Pocket Books

Categories Menu

Freshly Pressed