Page Loading... please wait!


This message not going away?
Ensure Javascript is on and click the box
Unregistered? Register for a user account. Home :: Downloads :: Submit News :: Reviews :: FAQ   


Social Bookmark


Sandy Berger Headlines

Feeds -  Popular -  Latest
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters via Yahoo!Xtra News)
January 5, 2009, 11:10 pm EST
NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters)
January 5, 2009, 10:06 pm EST
NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
NBC bumps Ann Coulter, denies conspiracy (Reuters via Yahoo! News)
January 5, 2009, 9:52 pm EST
NBC News denied Monday that conservative author Ann Coulter has been banned from the network after "Today" dropped her from Tuesday's program because of breaking-news events.
BAD 'DAY' FOR ANN COULTER (New York Post)
January 5, 2009, 7:53 pm EST
CONTROVERSIAL conservative Ann Coulter blew a gasket yesterday when the "Today" show abruptly canceled an appearance on the day her new book about the Obamas comes out. The cancellation sparked reports that she had been "banned for life" from NBC...
Ann Coulter Kicked Off NBC's 'Today Show' (Editor & Publisher)
January 5, 2009, 7:34 pm EST
NEW YORK Was columnist and author Ann Coulter merely cancelled for one day -- or, as Matt Drudge headlines it at his blog, "banned for life" due to alleged untruths in her new book?
Liberal Media Won't Help Poor Ann Coulter Plug Her Book [Bias] (Gawker)
January 5, 2009, 6:30 pm EST
Ann Coulter has a new book out called GLORBAHLF: LIBERAL TERROR DEATH and she was going to go sell this book on Today but then NBC woke up and remembered that its not 2002. These terrible people...
Standing up to Bush (Las Vegas Sun)
January 5, 2009, 11:42 am EST
Recurring themes of the Bush administration — secrecy and low regard for science — are prevalent in two White House actions that are now stimulating considerable opposition.
Patrick Tyler's 'A World of Trouble': an opinionated look at the Middle East (Austin American-Statesman)
January 3, 2009, 12:09 pm EST
Patrick Tyler is a veteran foreign correspondent who has worked the Middle East and China beats since the mid '80s, first for The Washington Post and then for The New York Times.


Money Clip


Past Articles

Older articles

National Defense

Pakistan

The Bush administration immediately encountered the dilemmas that arose from the varied objectives the United States was trying to accomplish in its relationship with Pakistan. In February 2001, President Bush wrote General Musharraf on a number of matters. He emphasized that Bin Ladin and al Qaeda were "a direct threat to the United States and its interests that must be addressed." He urged Musharraf to use his influence with the Taliban on Bin Ladin and al Qaeda.214 Powell and Armitage reviewed the possibility of acquiring more carrots to dangle in front of Pakistan. Given the generally negative view of Pakistan on Capitol Hill, the idea of lifting sanctions may have seemed far-fetched, but perhaps no more so than the idea of persuading Musharraf to antagonize the Islamists in his own government and nation.215

On June 18, Rice met with the visiting Pakistani foreign minister, Abdul Sattar. She "really let him have it" about al Qaeda, she told us.216 Other evidence corroborates her account. But, as she was upbraiding Sattar, Rice recalled thinking that the Pakistani diplomat seemed to have heard it all before. Sattar urged senior U.S. policymakers to engage the Taliban, arguing that such a course would take time but would produce results. In late June, the deputies agreed to review U.S. objectives. Clarke urged Hadley to split off all other issues in U.S.-Pakistani relations and just focus on demanding that Pakistan move vigorously against terrorism-to push the Pakistanis to do before an al Qaeda attack what Washington would demand that they do after. He had made similar requests in the Clinton administration; he had no more success with Rice than he had with Berger.217

On August 4, President Bush wrote President Musharraf to request his support in dealing with terrorism and to urge Pakistan to engage actively against al Qaeda. The new administration was again registering its concerns, just as its predecessor had, but it was still searching for new incentives to open up diplomatic possibilities. For its part, Pakistan had done little. Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca described the administration's plan to break this logjam as a move from "half engagement" to "enhanced engagement." The administration was not ready to confront Islamabad and threaten to rupture relations. Deputy Secretary Armitage told us that before 9/11, the envisioned new approach to Pakistan had not yet been attempted.218

Page << | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | >>

Pocket Lint

A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul.

-- George Bernard Shaw

In the Cuff

Poll

Most inept figure during Katrina?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 110
Comments: 0

Pocket Books

Categories Menu

Freshly Pressed