Page Loading... please wait!


This message not going away?
Ensure Javascript is on and click the box
Unregistered? Register for a user account. Home :: Downloads :: Submit News :: Reviews :: FAQ   


Social Bookmark


Sandy Berger Headlines

Feeds -  Popular -  Latest
Mitt Romney Gets The Love, Ron Paul (And Newt Gingrich) Should, Too
February 9, 2012, 5:53 am CST
I appeared as a guest on RT America yesterday (full clip below) to discuss ongoing media bias of the 2012 GOP election coverage -- and by media bias, I don't merely mean a reporter occasionally slipping up and revealing his or her favored ...
Mitt Romney Gets The Love, Ron Paul (And Newt Gingrich) Should, Too
February 9, 2012, 2:53 am CST
I appeared as a guest on RT America yesterday (full clip below) to discuss ongoing media bias of the 2012 GOP election coverage -- and by media bias, I don't merely mean a reporter occasionally slipping up and revealing his or her favored ...
Mitt Romney Gets The Love, Ron Paul (And Newt Gingrich) Should, Too
February 9, 2012, 1:38 am CST
I appeared as a guest on RT America yesterday (full clip below) to discuss ongoing media bias of the 2012 GOP election coverage -- and by media bias, I don't merely mean a reporter occasionally slipping up and revealing his or her favored ...
Komen flap reveals liberal media bias, encroaches on rights, columnists say
February 6, 2012, 8:03 am CST
The mainstream media is drawing criticism from its own for what's seen as a pro-choice bias in the reporting of the ongoing...
Komen flap reveals liberal media bias, encroaches on rights, columnists say
February 6, 2012, 7:49 am CST
The mainstream media is drawing criticism from its own for what's seen as a pro-choice bias in the reporting of the ongoing...
Liberal media bias can't be denied
February 6, 2012, 6:13 am CST
Re "Liberal media image doesn't reflect what is being reported," (Viewpoints, Feb. 4)
Insiders: Pentagon's Budget Cuts Are Pragmatic for Changing Times
February 6, 2012, 7:30 am CST
Three-quarters of National Journal’s National Security Insiders said the Obama administration’s plan to cut the Pentagon budget was a smart decision driven by the end of the Iraq war and the nation’s current fiscal crisis, ...
Grasping a new reality
February 4, 2012, 11:33 pm CST
WASHINGTON — First, they had to get the handshake right. Two decades earlier in Geneva, Chinese Premier Zhou En-lai had been mortally offended when U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles spurned his offered hand. As TV cameras flashed ...


Money Clip


Past Articles

Older articles

911: 911 Report section 5.4 A Money Trail?

Posted by: archiveguard on Aug 08, 2005 - 04:24 PM
National Defense

5.4 A MONEY TRAIL?

Bin Ladin and his aides did not need a very large sum to finance their planned attack on America. The 9/11 plotters eventually spent somewhere between $400,000 and $500,000 to plan and conduct their attack. Consistent with the importance of the project, al Qaeda funded the plotters. KSM provided his operatives with nearly all the money they needed to travel to the United States, train, and live. The plotters' tradecraft was not especially sophisticated, but it was good enough. They moved, stored, and spent their money in ordinary ways, easily defeating the detection mechanisms in place at the time.110 The origin of the funds remains unknown, although we have a general idea of how al Qaeda financed itself during the period leading up to 9/11.

General Financing


As we explained in chapter 2, Bin Ladin did not fund al Qaeda through a personal fortune and a network of businesses in Sudan. Instead, al Qaeda relied primarily on a fund-raising network developed over time. The CIA now estimates that it cost al Qaeda about $30 million per year to sustain its activities before 9/11 and that this money was raised almost entirely through donations.111

For many years, the United States thought Bin Ladin financed al Qaeda's expenses through a vast personal inheritance. Bin Ladin purportedly inherited approximately $300 million when his father died, and was rumored to have had access to these funds to wage jihad while in Sudan and Afghanistan and to secure his leadership position in al Qaeda. In early 2000, the U.S. government discovered a different reality: roughly from 1970 through 1994, Bin Ladin received about $1 million per year-a significant sum, to be sure, but not a $300 million fortune that could be used to fund jihad.112 Then, as part of a Saudi government crackdown early in the 1990s, the Bin Ladin family was forced to find a buyer for Usama's share of the family company in 1994.The Saudi government subsequently froze the proceeds of the sale. This action had the effect of divesting Bin Ladin of what otherwise might indeed have been a large fortune.113

Nor were Bin Ladin's assets in Sudan a source of money for al Qaeda. When Bin Ladin lived in Sudan from 1991 to 1996, he owned a number of businesses and other assets. These could not have provided significant income, as most were small or not economically viable. When Bin Ladin left in 1996, it appears that the Sudanese government expropriated all his assets: he left Sudan with practically nothing. When Bin Ladin arrived in Afghanistan, he relied on the Taliban until he was able to reinvigorate his fund-raising efforts by drawing on ties to wealthy Saudi individuals that he had established during the Afghan war in the 1980s.114

Al Qaeda appears to have relied on a core group of financial facilitators who raised money from a variety of donors and other fund-raisers, primarily in the Gulf countries and particularly in Saudi Arabia.115 Some individual donors surely knew, and others did not, the ultimate destination of their donations. Al Qaeda and its friends took advantage of Islam's strong calls for charitable giving, zakat. These financial facilitators also appeared to rely heavily on certain imams at mosques who were willing to divert zakat donations to al Qaeda's cause.116

Al Qaeda also collected money from employees of corrupt charities.117 It took two approaches to using charities for fund-raising. One was to rely on al Qaeda sympathizers in specific foreign branch offices of large, international charities-particularly those with lax external oversight and ineffective internal controls, such as the Saudi-based al Haramain Islamic Foundation.118 Smaller charities in various parts of the globe were funded by these large Gulf charities and had employees who would siphon the money to al Qaeda.119

Page << | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | >>

Pocket Lint

There are just two rules of governance in a free society: Mind your own business. Keep your hands to yourself.

-- P.J. O'Rourke

In the Cuff

Poll

Most inept figure during Katrina?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 120
Comments: 0

Pocket Books


The FairTax Book
Neal Boortz

Categories Menu

Freshly Pressed